Skip to content

Vendor selection

Choose the working relationship, not just the product.

For leadership teams comparing technology providers, platforms, renewals, or replacements, where accountability matters as much as features.

What still has to be true after the sales pitch is over?

A good demo proves a product can do something. It doesn't prove your organization can run it, that everyone understands their responsibilities, or that the commercial terms will still make sense once your needs change.

A good selection process starts with the business outcome and how you actually work. The criteria should separate must-haves from nice-to-haves, flag the assumptions that need checking, and name who will own adoption, administration, support, security, and renewal.

Our job isn't to pretend every option is equally good. It's to make the basis for the recommendation clear, and keep the vendor's claims separate from what's actually been verified.

To be clear

We don't rank vendors or claim independence we don't have. Any commercial relationships or conflicts get disclosed if they exist.

What to check

Six things to check before a shortlist becomes a commitment.

  • Business fitThe outcome, users, workflows, and constraints the option has to support.
  • ResponsibilityWhat the provider owns, what stays with you, and where you need another partner.
  • Day-to-day effortAdministration, integration, training, support, reporting, and ongoing maintenance.
  • Risk and controlAccess, data handling, continuity, dependency, exit terms, and who has final say.
  • Commercial termsPrice structure, term length, renewal mechanics, growth assumptions, and switching cost.
  • Realistic transitionDiscovery, migration, sign-off, ownership transfer, and what a rollback would take.

How we run it

Evidence before preference.

The process scales to the decision. A renewal might need a short options brief; a platform change might need structured discovery and a formal transition plan.

  1. Define the decision and who decides

    State why this decision needs to happen now, who can approve it, and what's out of scope.

  2. Turn your needs into evidence requests

    Use scenarios, references, contract language, and technical checks where it makes sense.

  3. Keep track of trade-offs consistently

    Separate confirmed facts, vendor claims, open questions, assumptions, and what falls on you.

  4. Set sign-off and exit conditions

    Name the transition owner, checkpoints, unresolved risks, and the point where responsibility transfers.

Still deciding whether to buy at all? Weigh it against building or configuring

See this same method applied to a phone-system replacement

Common example

A renewal is still a decision.

Sticking with a familiar provider might still be the right call. The real question is whether your current need, service boundaries, workload, commercial terms, and alternatives still back that up.

Hypothetical example: before renewing a collaboration platform, leadership might compare identity dependencies, migration effort, user impact, contract timing, and who owns administration - not just the feature list.

See a sample vendor comparison

Next decision

Bring the shortlist - or the renewal you've never actually challenged.

A focused brief can turn competing claims into criteria, evidence gaps, ownership, and a clear next step.